18.3 The Mackey-Arens Theorem

Definition 18.3.1 (Consistent).label Let $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$ be a duality over $K \in \RC$ and $\mathcal{T}\subset 2^{E}$ be a locally convex topology, then $\mathcal{T}$ is consistent with $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$ if $(E, \mathcal{T})^{*} = F$.

Lemma 18.3.2.label Let $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$ be a duality over $K \in \RC$, $\mathcal{T}\subset 2^{E}$ be a locally convex topology consistent with $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$, then for any $A \subset E$ convex, the $\mathcal{T}$-closure of $A$ and the $\sigma(E, F)$-closure of $A$ coincide.

Proof. By the Hahn-Banach theorem.$\square$

Theorem 18.3.3 (Mackey-Arens).label Let $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$ be a duality over $K \in \RC$.

  1. (E)

    For any locally convex topology $\mathcal{T}\subset 2^{E}$ consistent with $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$, $\mathcal{T}$ is the topology of uniform convergence on all $\mathcal{T}$-equicontinuous subsets of $F$.

  2. (C)

    For any saturated covering ideal $\sigma \subset 2^{F}$ consisting of relatively $\sigma(F, E)$-compact sets, the $\sigma$-uniform topology on $E$ is consistent with $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$.

Moreover,

  1. (M)

    The topology of uniform convergence on relatively $\sigma(F, E)$-compact, convex, and circled sets is the finest locally convex topology on $E$ consistent with $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$.

and strongest locally convex topology on $E$ consistent with $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$ is the Mackey topology of $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$ on $E$, denoted $\tau(E, F)$.

Proof. (E): Let $\cf \subset F$ be a $\mathcal{T}$-equicontinuous subset, then $\cf^{\circ} \in \cn_{\mathcal{T}}(0)$. If $\cf$ is circled, then

\[\cf^{\circ} = \bracsn{x \in E|\ |\dpn{x, y}{\lambda}| \le 1 \forall y \in \cf}\]

Thus $\mathcal{T}$ is finer than the topology of uniform convergence on all $\mathcal{T}$-equicontinuous subsets of $F$.

Conversely, for any convex and closed neighbourhood $U \in \cn_{\mathcal{T}}(0)$, $U^{\circ}$ is equicontinuous. By the Bipolar Theorem, $U^{\circ \circ}= U$, so the family

\[\fB = \bracsn{\cf^\circ| \cf \subset F, \cf \text{ is } \mathcal{T}\text{-equicontinuous}}\]

is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods at $0$ for $\mathcal{T}$. Hence $\mathcal{T}$ is coarser than the topology of uniform convergence on all $\mathcal{T}$-equicontinuous subsets of $F$.

(C): Let $\mathcal{T}$ be the $\sigma$-uniform topology on $E$, and $E^{*}$ be the dual of $(E, \mathcal{T})$. Since $\sigma$ is covering, it contains all singletons, so $\mathcal{T}\supset \sigma(E, F)$, and $F \subset E^{*}$. Thus it is sufficient to show that $F = E^{*}$.

Let $\phi \in E^{*}$ and $\bracs{\phi}^{\circ}$ be the polar of $\phi$ with respect to $\dpn{E, E^*}{E}$. Since $\phi$ is continuous, $\bracs{\phi}^{\circ} \in \cn_{\mathcal{T}}(0)$. Thus there exists $A \in \sigma$ and $\mu > 0$ such that

\[\bracsn{x \in E|\dpn{x, \psi}{E} \le \mu \forall \psi \in A}\subset \bracsn{x \in E|\dpn{x, \phi}{E} \le 1}= \bracs{\phi}^{\circ}\]

Since $\sigma$ is covering and saturated, assume without loss of generality that $\mu = 1$ and that $A$ is convex, circled, and $\sigma(F, E)$-compact with $0 \in A$. In which case, let $A^{\circ}$ be the polar of $A$ with respect to $\dpn{E, E^*}{E}$, then

\[A^{\circ} = \bracsn{x \in E|\dpn{x, \psi}{E} \le 1 \forall \psi \in A}\subset \bracs{\phi}^{\circ}\]

Let $A^{\circ\circ}$ and $\bracs{\phi}^{\circ\circ}$ be the bipolar of $A$ and $\bracs{\phi}$ with respect to $\dpn{E, E^*}{E}$, then by Proposition 18.2.3, $A^{\circ\circ}\supset \bracs{\phi}^{\circ\circ}$.

Now, $A$ is $\sigma(F, E)$-compact, and hence $\sigma(E^{*}, E)$-compact in $E^{*}$[1] by Proposition 5.16.4. Thus by the Bipolar Theorem, $\phi \in A^{\circ\circ}= A \subset F$.

(M): By (C), the topology of uniform convergence on relatively $\sigma(E, F)$-compact, convex, and circled sets is consistent with $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$.

On the other hand, let $\mathcal{T}\subset 2^{E}$ be a locally convex topology consistent with $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$. By the Banach-Alaoglu Theorem, every $\mathcal{T}$-equicontinuous set is relatively $\sigma(F, E)$-compact. Therefore $\mathcal{T}$ is coarser than the topology of uniform convergence on relatively $\sigma(E, F)$-compact, convex, and circled sets.$\square$

Corollary 18.3.4.label Let $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$ be a duality over $K \in \RC$, $\topo$ be a topology on $E$ consistent with $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$, and $B \subset E$, then $B$ is bounded with respect to $\topo$ if and only if $B$ is bounded with respect to $\sigma(E, F)$.

Proof. Assume without loss of generality that $\topo = \tau(E, F)$. Suppose that $B$ is $\sigma(E, F)$-bounded. Let $A \subset F$ be convex, circled, and $\sigma(F, E)$-compact. By continuity of dual pairing,

\[A = \bracsn{\phi \in F|\ |\dpn{x, \phi}{\lambda}| \le 1 \forall x \in B}\]

is a convex, circled, and closed subset. Given that $B$ is $\sigma(E, F)$-bounded, $\sup_{x \in B}|\dpn{x, \phi}{\lambda}| < \infty$ for all $x \in E$. Thus $A$ is absorbing and hence a barrel.

Since $B$ is compact, the auxiliary space $E_{B}$ is a Banach space. In particular, $E_{B}$ is barrelled by Proposition 13.4.4. By continuity of the inclusion map, $A \cap E_{B}$ is a barrel in $E_{B}$. Therefore there exists $\lambda > 0$ such that $B \subset \lambda A \cap E_{B} \subset \lambda A$.$\square$

Definition 18.3.5 (Mackey Space).label Let $E$ be a separated locally convex space over $K \in \RC$, then $E$ is a Mackey space if $E$ is equipped with the Mackey topology of $\dpn{E, E^*}{E}$.

Proposition 18.3.6.label Let $E$ be a separated barrelled space over $K \in \RC$, then $E$ is a Mackey space.

Proof. Let $\cf \subset E^{*}$ be a $\sigma(E^{*}, E)$-compact set and $U \in \cn_{K}(0)$ be a barrel, then $V = \bigcap_{\phi \in \cf}\phi^{-1}(U)$ is convex, circled, and closed. For each $x \in E$, $\cf(x) = \bracs{\dpn{x, \phi}{E}|\phi \in \cf}$ is bounded. Thus $V$ is absorbing and hence a barrel. Since $E$ is barrelled, $V \in \cn_{E}(0)$. Therefore the Mackey topology is contained in the topology of $E$, and $E$ is a Mackey space.$\square$

  1. Closedness is insufficient because $F$ is $\sigma(E^{*}, E)$-dense in $E^{*}$ by Lemma 18.1.5. keyboard_return

Post a Comment

Name:Email:
Please enter the tag of the current page (12P) to post the comment.
Tag: