Lemma 37.4.2.label Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space, $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, and $E: \cb_{X} \to B(H)$ be a spectral measure relative to $H$, then:

  1. (1)

    For each $x, y \in H$, $\norm{E_{x, y}}_{\text{var}}\le \norm{x}_{H} \norm{y}_{H}$.

Let $\mathscr{E}\subset M_{R}(X; \complex)$ be the closed subspace generated by $\bracsn{E_{x, y}|x, y \in H}$, then

  1. (2)

    For any $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ and $\nu \in M_{R}(X; \complex)$ with $\nu \ll \mu$, $\nu \in \mathscr{E}$ as well.

  2. (3)

    Let

    \[J: B^{\infty}(X; \complex) \to \mathscr{E}^{*} \quad \dpn{\mu, J(f)}{\mathscr{E}}= \int_{X} f d\mu\]

    then $\mathscr{E}^{*}$ admits a unique weak*-continuous involution and a unique separately weak*-continuous product, such that $\mathscr{E}^{*}$ is a commutative unital $C^{*}$-algebra, and $J$ is a unital *-homomorphism.

Proof. (1): Let $x, y \in H$, $\seqf{B_j}\subset \cb_{X}$ be disjoint Borel sets, and $B = \bigsqcup_{j = 1}^{n} B_{j}$, then for each $1 \le i < j \le n$, $E(B_{i})(H) \perp E(B_{j})(H)$, so by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Pythagorean Theorem,

\begin{align*}\sum_{j = 1}^{n} |\dpn{E(B_j)x, y}{H}|&= \sum_{j = 1}^{n} |\dpn{E(B_j)x, E(B_j)y}{H}| \\&\le \sum_{j = 1}^{n} \norm{E(B_j)x}_{H} \norm{E(B_j)y}_{H} \\&\le \braks{\sum_{j = 1}^n \norm{E(B_j)x}_H^2}^{1/2}\cdot \braks{\sum_{j = 1}^n \norm{E(B_j)y}_H^2}^{1/2}\\&= \norm{E(B)x}_{H} \cdot \norm{E(B)y}_{H} \le \norm{x}_{H} \cdot \norm{y}_{H}\end{align*}

As the above holds for all finite sequences of disjoint Borel sets, $\norm{E_{x, y}}_{\text{var}}\le \norm{x}_{H} \norm{y}_{H}$.

(2): For each $x, y \in H$ and $B, C \in \cb_{X}$,

\[\int_{C} \one_{B} dE_{x, y}= \dpn{E(C \cap B)x, y}{H}= \dpn{E(C)E(B)x, y}{H}= E_{E(B)x, y}(C)\]

By linearity, $fdE_{x, y}\in \mathscr{E}$ for all $f \in \Sigma(X; \complex)$. For each $f \in \Sigma(X; \complex)$, the mapping $\mu \mapsto f d\mu$ is continuous in the total variation norm, so $fd\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ for all $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ and $f \in \Sigma(X; \complex)$. By Proposition 16.1.10, $\Sigma(X; \complex)$ is dense in $L^{1}(\mu; \complex)$ for all $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$. Therefore $fd\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ for all $f \in L^{1}(\mu; \complex)$ and $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$.

Finally, let $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ and $\nu \in M_{R}(X; \complex)$ with $\nu \ll \mu$, then by the Radon-Nikodym Theorem, there exists $f \in L^{1}(\mu; \complex)$ such that $d\nu = f d\mu \in \mathscr{E}$.

(3): By (2), for any $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ and $f \in L^{1}(\mu; \complex)$, $fd\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ as well. By Proposition 38.8.1, there exists a unique weak*-continuous involution and separately weak*-continuous product on $\mathscr{E}^{*}$ making $\mathscr{E}^{*}$ a commutative unital $C^{*}$-algebra, and $J|_{C(X; \complex)}$ a unital *-homomorphism. Since

  1. (i)

    $J$ is $\sigma(B^{\infty}(X; \complex), M_{R}(X; \complex))$-$\sigma(\mathscr{E}^{*}, \mathscr{E})$ continuous.

  2. (ii)

    Conjugation on $B^{\infty}(X; \complex)$ is $\sigma(B^{\infty}(X; \complex), M_{R}(X; \complex))$-continuous.

  3. (iii)

    Multiplication on $B^{\infty}(X; \complex)$ is separately $\sigma(B^{\infty}(X; \complex), M_{R}(X; \complex))$-continuous.

the mapping $J$ is a unital *-homomorphism.$\square$

Post a Comment

Name:Email:
Please enter the tag of the current page (1CK) to post the comment.
Tag: