Proposition 38.11.4.label Let $A$ be a unital $C^{*}$ algebra, $\phi \in S(A)$ be a state, and $(H, \pi, \xi)$ be its GNS triple, then $\phi$ is a pure state if and only if $(H, \pi)$ is irreducible.

Proof. ($\Rightarrow$): Suppose that $(H, \pi)$ is reducible, then there exists a non-trivial invariant subspace $M \subset H$. Let $P \in B(H)$ be the orthogonal projection onto $M$, $\xi_{1} = P\xi/\norm{P\xi}_{H}$, and $\xi_{2} = (\xi - P\xi)/\norm{\xi - P\xi}_{H}$. For each $x \in A$, let

\[\dpn{x, \phi_1}{A}= \dpn{\pi(x)\xi_1, \xi_1}{H}\quad \dpn{x, \phi_2}{A}= \dpn{\pi(x)\xi_2, \xi_2}{H}\]

then $\phi_{1}$ and $\phi_{2}$ are vector states on $A$. Since $M$ and $M^{\perp}$ are invariant for $\pi$,

\begin{align*}\dpn{x, \phi}{A}&= \dpn{\pi(x)\xi, \xi}{A}= \dpn{\pi(x)P\xi, P\xi}{A}+ \dpn{\pi(x)(I - P)\xi, (I - P)\xi}{A}\\&= \norm{P\xi}_{H}^{2}\dpn{\pi(x)\xi_1, \xi_1}{H}+ \norm{(1 - P)\xi}_{H}^{2} \dpn{\pi(x)\xi_2, \xi_2}{H}\\&= \norm{P\xi}_{H}^{2} \dpn{x, \phi_1}{A}+ \norm{(1 - P)\xi}_{H}^{2} \dpn{x, \phi_2}{A}\end{align*}

so $\phi$ is a strict convex combination of two states, and is not pure.

($\Leftarrow$): Suppose that $(H, \pi)$ is irreducible. Let $t \in (0, 1)$ and $\phi_{1}, \phi_{2} \in S(A)$ with $\phi = t\phi_{1} + (1 - t)\phi_{2}$. Let $T: \pi(A)H \to H$ be defined by

\[\dpn{T\pi(x)\xi, \pi(y)\xi}{H}= \dpn{x, y}{\phi_1}= \dpn{y^*x, \phi_1}{A}\]

then since $\phi_{1} \le t^{-1}\phi$, $T$ extends continuously into a positive operator in $B(H)$. Moreover, for any $x, y, z \in A$,

\begin{align*}\dpn{\pi(z)T\pi(x)\xi, \pi(y)\xi}{H}&= \dpn{T\pi(x)\xi, \pi(z^*y)\xi}{H}\\&= \dpn{y^*zx, \phi_1}{A}= \dpn{T\pi(z)\pi(x)\xi, \xi}{H}\end{align*}

so $T \in \pi(A)'$. By Schur’s Lemma, there exists $\lambda \in \complex$ such that $T = \lambda I$. However, since $\dpn{T\xi, \xi}{H}= \dpn{1_A, \phi_1}{A}= 1$, $\lambda = 1$, $T = I$, and $\phi_{1} = \phi$. By symmetry, $\phi_{2} = \phi$ as well.$\square$

Post a Comment

Name:Email:
Please enter the tag of the current page (1H6) to post the comment.
Tag: