Proposition 32.3.5.label Let $G$ be a locally compact group, $\phi \in S(G)$ be a state, and $(H_{\phi}, \pi_{\phi}, \xi_{\phi})$ be the GNS triple associated with $\phi$, then $(H_{\phi}, \pi_{\phi})$ is irreducible if and only if $\phi$ is an extreme point of $S(G)$.

Proof. ($\Rightarrow$): Suppose that $(H_{\phi}, \pi_{\phi})$ is irreducible. Let $\psi_{1}, \psi_{2} \in S(G)$ and $t \in (0, 1)$ such that $\phi = t\psi_{1} + (1 - t)\psi_{2}$. Define

\[T: H_{\phi} \to H_{\phi} \quad \dpn{T\pi_\phi(f)\xi_\phi, \pi_\phi(g)\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}= \dpn{f, g}{\psi_1}= \dpn{g^* * f, \psi_1}{L^1(G; \complex)}\]

where $f, g \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$. Since both $\psi_{1}$ and $\psi_{2}$ are positive-definite functions, $\phi - t\psi_{1}$ is also positive-definite. In particular, $\dpn{f, f}{\psi_1}\le t^{-1}\dpn{f, f}{\phi}$ for all $f \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$, so $T$ extends continuously into a positive operator on $H_{\phi}$.

For any $x \in G$ and $f, g \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$,

\begin{align*}\dpn{\pi_\phi(x)T\pi_\phi(f)\xi_\phi, \pi_\phi(g)\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}&= \dpn{T\pi_\phi(f)\xi_\phi, \pi_\phi(x^{-1})\pi_\phi(g)\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}\\&= \dpn{T\pi_\phi(f)\xi_\phi, \pi_\phi(L_{x^{-1}}g)\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}\\&= \dpn{f, L_{x^{-1}}g}{\psi_1}= \dpn{(L_{x^{-1}}g)^* * f, \psi_1}{L^1(G; \complex)}\\&= \dpn{g^* * (L_xf), \psi_1}{L^1(G; \complex)}= \dpn{L_xf, g}{\psi_1}\\&= \dpn{T\pi_\phi(L_xf)\xi_\phi, \pi_\phi(g)\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}\\&= \dpn{T\pi_\phi(x)\pi_\phi(f)\xi_\phi, \pi_\phi(g)\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}\end{align*}

so $T \in \pi_{\phi}(G)'$. By Schur’s Lemma, there exists $\lambda \in \complex \setminus \bracsn{0}$ such that $T = \lambda I$.

Using Proposition 31.4.10, let $\angles{g_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A}\subset L^{1}(G; \complex)$ be an approximate identity for $L^{1}(G; \complex)$, then for any $f \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$,

\[\dpn{f, \psi_1}{L^1(G; \complex)}= \lim_{\alpha \in A}\dpn{f, g_\alpha}{\psi_1}= \lim_{\alpha \in A}\lambda\dpn{f, g_\alpha}{\phi}= \lambda \dpn{f, \phi}{L^1(G; \complex)}\]

Since $\phi, \psi_{1} \in S(G)$, $\lambda = 1$, and $\phi = \psi_{1}$. As the argument is symmetric, $\phi = \psi_{1} = \psi_{2}$.

($\Leftarrow$): Suppose that $(H_{\phi}, \pi_{\phi})$ is reducible. By Schur’s Lemma, $\pi_{\phi}(G)'$ is non-trivial. Since $\pi_{\phi}(G)'$ is a von Neumann algebra, it admits a non-trivial projection $P \in B(H_{\phi})$ by Theorem 39.6.2.

Let $\xi_{1} = P\xi_{\phi}/\normn{P\xi_\phi}_{H_\phi}$ and $\xi_{2} = (1 - P)\xi_{\phi}/\normn{\xi_\phi - P\xi_\phi}_{H_\phi}$. For each $f \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$, let

\[\dpn{f, \psi_1}{L^1(G; \complex)}= \dpn{\pi_\phi(f)\xi_1, \xi_1}{H_\phi}\quad \dpn{f, \psi_2}{L^1(G; \complex)}= \dpn{\pi_\phi(f)\xi_2, \xi_2}{H_\phi}\]

then $\psi_{1}, \psi_{2} \in S(G)$. Since $P \in \pi_{\phi}(G)'$, for any $f \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$,

\begin{align*}\dpn{f, \phi}{L^1(G; \complex)}&= \dpn{\pi_\phi(f)\xi_\phi, \xi_\phi}{H_\phi}\\&= \dpn{\pi_\phi(f)P\xi_\phi, P\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}+ \dpn{\pi_\phi(f)(I - P)\xi_\phi, (I - P)\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}\\&= \normn{P\xi_\phi}_{H_\phi}^{2}\dpn{\pi_\phi(f)\xi_1, \xi_1}{H_\phi}+ \normn{(1 - P)\xi_\phi}_{H_\phi}^{2} \dpn{\pi_\phi(f)\xi_2, \xi_2}{H_\phi}\\&= \normn{P\xi_\phi}_{H_\phi}^{2} \dpn{f, \psi_1}{L^1(G; \complex)}+ \normn{(1 - P)\xi_\phi}_{H_\phi}^{2} \dpn{f, \psi_2}{L^1(G; \complex)}\end{align*}

so $\phi$ is a strict convex combination of two states. If $\psi_{1} = \phi$, then for any $f, g \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$,

\begin{align*}\dpn{\pi_\phi(f)\xi_\phi, \pi_\phi(g)\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}&= \normn{P\xi_\phi}_{H_\phi}^{-2}\dpn{P\pi_\phi(f)\xi_\phi, \pi_\phi(g)\xi_\phi}{H_\phi}\\ \dpn{[\pi_\phi(f) - \normn{P\xi_\phi}_{H_\phi}^{-2}P\pi_\phi(f)]\xi_\phi,\pi_\phi(g) \xi_\phi}{H_\phi}&= 0\end{align*}

so $I - \normn{P\xi_\phi}_{H_\phi}^{-2}P = 0$, which contradicts the fact that $P$ is a non-trivial projection.$\square$

Post a Comment

Name:Email:
Please enter the tag of the current page (1HJ) to post the comment.
Tag: