41.3 Completely Positive and Completely Bounded Maps

Proposition 41.3.1.label Let $A$ be a $C^{*}$-algebra, $M_{n}(A) = M_{n}(\complex) \otimes A$ be the space of $n \times n$ matrices over $A$,

\[M_{n}(A) \times M_{n}(A) \to M_{n}(A) \quad (M \otimes a)(N \otimes b) = MN \otimes ab\]

and the involution

\[*: M_{n}(A) \to M_{n}(A) \quad M \otimes a \mapsto M^{*} \otimes a^{*}\]

then there exists a unique norm on $M_{n}(A)$ such that $M_{n}(A)$ is a $C^{*}$-algebra.

Proof. After applying a unitisation, assume without loss of generality that $A$ is unital.

By the Gelfand-Naimark Theorem, there exists a faithful representation $(H, \pi)$ of $A$. Under the identification that $H^{n} = \complex^{n} \otimes H$, $\pi$ induces a faithful unital *-representation

\[\pi_{n}: M_{n}(A) \to B(H^{n}) \quad \pi_{n}(M \otimes a)(\lambda \otimes \xi) = (M\lambda) \otimes (\pi(a)\xi)\]

whose image is a uniformly closed subalgebra of $B(H^{n})$. As such, $B(H^{n})$ induces a norm on $M_{n}(A)$, making it a $C^{*}$-algebra.

By Corollary 38.4.5, this norm is unique.$\square$

Definition 41.3.2 (Extended Map).label Let $A$ be a unital $C^{*}$-algebra, $B$ be a $C^{*}$-algebra, $S \subset A$ be an operator system, $\phi: S \to B$ be a linear map, and $n \in \natp$, then the mapping

\[\phi_{n} = \text{Id}_{M_n(\complex)}\otimes \phi: M_{n}(S) \to M_{n}(B)\]

is the extended map/amplification of $\phi$ to $M_{n}(S)$.

Definition 41.3.3 (Completely Positive Map).label Let $A, B$ be $C^{*}$-algebras with $A$ being unital, $S \subset A$ be an operator system, $\phi: S \to B$ be a linear map, and $n \in \natp$, then $\phi$ is $n$-positive if $\phi_{n}: M_{n}(S) \to M_{n}(B)$ is positive. The map $\phi$ is completely positive if $\phi$ is $n$-positive for all $n \in \natp$.

Definition 41.3.4 (Completely Bounded Map).label Let $A, B$ be $C^{*}$-algebras with $A$ being unital, $S \subset A$ be an operator system, and $\phi: S \to B$ be a linear map, then

\[\norm{\phi}_{\text{cb}}= \sup_{n \in \natp}\norm{\phi_n}_{L(M_n(S); M_n(B))}\]

is the completely bounded norm of $\phi$.

The map $\phi$ is completely bounded if $\norm{\phi}_{\text{cb}}< \infty$, and completely contractive if $\norm{\phi}_{\text{cb}}\le 1$.

Lemma 41.3.5.label Let $A, B$ be $C^{*}$-algebras with $A$ being unital, $S \subset A$ be an operator system, $\phi: S \to B$ be a linear map, and $n \in \natp$.

  1. (1)

    If $\phi$ is $n$-positive, then $\phi$ is $k$-positive for all $1 \le k \le n$.

  2. (2)

    For each $1 \le k \le n$, $\norm{\phi_k}_{L(M_k(S); M_k(B))}\le \norm{\phi_n}_{L(M_n(S); M_n(B))}$.

Proof. For any $n \in \natp$ and $1 \le k < n$, there is a natural *-homomorphism

\[e: M_{k}(\complex) \to M_{n}(\complex) \quad M \mapsto \begin{bmatrix}M & 0 \\ 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}\]

such that the following diagram commutes:

\[\xymatrix{ M_k(S) \ar@{->}[d]_{e \otimes \text{Id}_S} \ar@{->}[r]^{\phi_k} & M_k(B) \ar@{->}[d]^{e \otimes \text{Id}_B} \\ M_n(S) \ar@{->}[r]_{\phi_n} & M_n(B) }\]

(1): Since $e \otimes \text{Id}_{S}$ is the restriction of a *-homomorphism, it is positive. On the other hand, for any $x \in M_{k}(B)$, $x \ge 0$ if and only if $(e \otimes \text{Id}_{B})(x) \ge 0$. Given that $\phi_{n}$ is positive, $\phi_{k}$ must also be positive.

(2): The maps $e \otimes \text{Id}_{S}$ and $e \otimes \text{Id}_{B}$ are both isometric. As such, the norm of $\phi_{k}$ is bounded above by the norm of $\phi_{n}$.$\square$

Lemma 41.3.6.label Let $A$ be a unital $C^{*}$-algebra, then for any $x \in A$ and $y \in A_{sa}$, $x^{*}x \le y$ if and only if

\[\begin{bmatrix}1&x \\ x^{*}&y\end{bmatrix} \ge 0\]

in $M_{2}(A)$. In particular, $\norm{x}_{A} \le 1$ if and only if

\[\begin{bmatrix}1&x \\ x^{*}&1\end{bmatrix} \ge 0\]

in $M_{2}(A)$.

Proof, [Lemma 3.1, Po02]. Using the Gelfand-Naimark Theorem, assume without loss of generality that there exists a complex Hilbert space $H$ such that $A \subset B(H)$. For any $\xi, \eta \in H$,

\[\angles{ \begin{bmatrix}1&x \\ x^{*}&y\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\xi \\ \eta\end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix}\xi \\ \eta\end{bmatrix}}_{H^2}= \norm{\xi}_{H}^{2} + \dpn{x\eta, \xi}{H}+ \dpn{\xi, x\eta}{H}+ \dpn{y\eta, \eta}{H}\]

($\Rightarrow$): If $y \ge x^{*}x$, then by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,

\begin{align*}\angles{ \begin{bmatrix}1&x \\ x^{*}&y\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\xi \\ \eta\end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix}\xi \\ \eta\end{bmatrix}}_{H^2}&\ge \norm{\xi}_{H}^{2} + \dpn{x\eta, \xi}{H}+ \dpn{\xi, x\eta}{H}+ \dpn{x\eta, x\eta}{H}\\&\ge \norm{\xi}_{H}^{2} - 2\norm{\xi}_{H}\norm{x\eta}_{H} + \norm{x\eta}_{H}^{2} \ge 0\end{align*}

($\Leftarrow$): If the matrix is positive, then for each $\eta \in H$,

\begin{align*}0&\le \angles{ \begin{bmatrix}1&x \\ x^{*}&y\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}-x\eta \\ \eta\end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix}-x\eta \\ \eta\end{bmatrix}}_{H^2}= \norm{x\eta}_{H}^{2} -2\dpn{x\eta, x\eta}{H}+ \dpn{y\eta, \eta}{H}\\&\le \dpn{y\eta, \eta}{H}- \dpn{x\eta, x\eta}{H}= \dpn{(y - x^*x)\eta, \eta}{H}\end{align*}

so $y \ge x^{*}x$.$\square$

Proposition 41.3.7.label Let $A, B$ be unital $C^{*}$-algebras, $S \subset A$ be an operator system, $\phi: S \to B$ be a unital $2$-positive map, then $\norm{\phi}_{L(S; B)}\le 1$.

Proof, [Proposition 3.2, Po02]. Let $x \in S$ with $\norm{x}_{A} \le 1$, then

\[\phi_{2}\begin{bmatrix}1&x \\ x^{*}&1\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}1&\phi(x) \\ \phi(x)^{*}&1\end{bmatrix} \ge 0\]

By Lemma 41.3.6, $\norm{\phi(x)}_{B} \le 1$.$\square$

Proposition 41.3.8 (Kadison-Schwarz Inequality).label Let $A, B$ be unital $C^{*}$-algebras, $\phi: A \to B$ be a unital $2$-positive map, then for each $x \in A$,

\[\phi(x)^{*}\phi(x) \le \phi(x^{*}x)\]

Proof. Since

\[\begin{bmatrix}1&x \\ x^{*}&x^{*}x\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}1 &x \\ 0 &0\end{bmatrix}^{*}\begin{bmatrix}1 &x \\ 0 &0\end{bmatrix} \ge 0\]

and $\phi$ is unital and $2$-positive,

\[\begin{bmatrix}1&\phi(x) \\ \phi(x)^{*}&\phi(x^{*}x)\end{bmatrix} = \phi_{2}\begin{bmatrix}1&x \\ x^{*}&x^{*}x\end{bmatrix} \ge 0\]

By Lemma 41.3.6, $\phi(x)^{*}\phi(x) \le \phi(x^{*}x)$.$\square$

Lemma 41.3.9 (Schur Complement Condition for Positivity).label Let $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, $x, y \in B(H)$, and $z \in G(B(H))$, then

\[\begin{bmatrix}x&y \\ y^{*}&z\end{bmatrix} \ge 0\]

if and only if $z \ge 0$ and $x - yz^{-1}y^{*} \ge 0$.

Proof. ($\Leftarrow$): Suppose that $z \ge 0$ and $x - yz^{-1}y^{*} \ge 0$, then since $z$ is invertible,

\begin{align*}\begin{bmatrix}x&y \\ y^{*}&z\end{bmatrix}&= \begin{bmatrix}I&yz^{-1}\\ 0&I\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x - yz^{-1}y^{*}&0 \\ 0&z\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}I&0 \\ z^{-1}y^{*}&I\end{bmatrix} \\&= \begin{bmatrix}I&0 \\ z^{-1}y^{*}&I\end{bmatrix}^{*}\begin{bmatrix}x - yz^{-1}y^{*}&0 \\ 0&z\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}I&0 \\ z^{-1}y^{*}&I\end{bmatrix}\end{align*}

Since the middle factor is positive, the given matrix is positive as well.

($\Rightarrow$): Now suppose that the given matrix is positive, then for any $\xi \in H$,

\[\dpn{z\xi, \xi}{H}= \angles{\begin{bmatrix}x&y \\ y^{*}&z\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ \xi\end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ \xi\end{bmatrix}}_{H^2}\ge 0\]

so $z \ge 0$. As such,

\begin{align*}\begin{bmatrix}x - yz^{-1}y^{*}&0 \\ 0&z\end{bmatrix}&= \begin{bmatrix}I&-yz^{-1}\\ 0&I\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x&y \\ y^{*}&z\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}I&0 \\ -z^{-1}y^{*}&I\end{bmatrix} \\&= \begin{bmatrix}I&0 \\ -z^{-1}y^{*}&I\end{bmatrix}^{*}\begin{bmatrix}x&y \\ y^{*}&z\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}I&0 \\ -z^{-1}y^{*}&I\end{bmatrix} \\\end{align*}

Since the middle factor is positive, the left hand side is also positive. Therefore $x - yz^{-1}y^{*} \ge 0$ as well.$\square$

Proposition 41.3.10.label Let $A, B$ be $C^{*}$-algebras with $A$ being unital, $S \subset A$ be an operator system, and $\phi: S \to B$ be a completely positive map, then

\[\norm{\phi}_{\text{cb}}= \norm{\phi}_{L(S; B)}= \norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B}\]

Proof. After taking a unitisation, assume without loss of generality that $B$ is unital.

It is sufficient to show that $\norm{\phi}_{\text{cb}}\le \norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B}$. To this end, let $T \in M_{n}(S)$ with $\norm{T}_{M_n(S)}\le 1$, then

\[\begin{bmatrix}1_{M_n(A)}&T \\ T^{*}&1_{M_n(A)}\end{bmatrix} \ge 0\]

in $M_{2}(M_{n}(S)) = M_{2n}(S)$ by Lemma 41.3.6. Since $\phi$ is completely positive,

\[\phi_{2n}\begin{bmatrix}1_{M_n(A)}&T \\ T^{*}&1_{M_n(A)}\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}\phi_{n}(1_{M_n(A)})&\phi_{n}(T) \\ \phi_{n}(T)^{*}&\phi_{n}(1_{M_n(A)})\end{bmatrix} \ge 0\]

First suppose that $\phi_{n}(1_{M_n(A)})$ is invertible, then

\begin{align*}\phi_{n}(1_{M_n(A)})&\le \normn{\phi_n(1_{M_n(A)})}_{M_n(B)}\cdot 1_{M_n(B)}\\ 1_{M_n(B)}&\le \normn{\phi_n(1_{M_n(A)})}_{M_n(B)}\cdot \phi_{n}(1_{M_n(A)})^{-1}\\ \normn{\phi_n(1_{M_n(A)})}_{M_n(B)}^{-1}&\le \phi_{n}(1_{M_n(A)})^{-1}\end{align*}

By the Schur complement condition,

\begin{align*}\phi_{n}(1_{M_n(A)})&\ge \phi_{n}(T)\phi_{n}(1_{M_n(A)})^{-1}\phi_{n}(T)^{*} \\&\ge \normn{\phi_n(1_{M_n(A)})}_{M_n(B)}^{-1}\phi_{n}(T)\phi_{n}(T)^{*} \\ \normn{\phi_n(1_{M_n(A)})}_{M_n(B)}^{2}&\ge \normn{\phi_n(T)\phi_n(T)^*}_{M_n(B)}= \normn{\phi_n(T)}_{M_n(B)}^{2}\end{align*}

and $\normn{\phi_n(T)}_{M_n(B)}\le \normn{\phi_n(1_{M_n(A)})}_{M_n(B)}$. Therefore $\norm{\phi}_{\text{cb}}\le \normn{\phi(1_A)}_{B}$.

Now suppose that $\phi$ is an arbitrary completely positive map. Let $\psi \in S(A)$ be a state and $\eps > 0$, then $\phi + \eps 1_{B}\psi$ is also a completely positive map. In which case,

\[\norm{\phi}_{\text{cb}}\le \inf_{\eps > 0}\norm{\phi + \eps1_B\psi}_{\text{cb}}\le \inf_{\eps > 0}\norm{\phi(1_A) + \eps 1_B}_{B} = \norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B}\]

$\square$

Example 41.3.11.label Let $T: M_{2}(\complex) \to M_{2}(\complex)$ be the transpose map, then $T$ is positive, but not $2$-positive.

Proof. Let

\[C = \begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&1 \\ 0&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&0 \\ 1&0&0&1\end{bmatrix} = (1, 0, 0, 1) \otimes (1, 0, 0, 1) \ge 0\]

then

\[T_{2}(C) = \begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&1\end{bmatrix}\]

is invertible, with negative determinant, so $T_{2}(C)$ is not positive.$\square$

Example 41.3.12.label Let $A, B$ be $C^{*}$-algebras and $\phi: A \to B$ be a *-homomorphism, then $\phi$ is completely positive.

Proof. For each $n \in \natp$, the induced map $\phi_{n}: M_{n}(A) \to M_{n}(B)$ is a *-homomorphism.$\square$

Example 41.3.13.label Let $A$ be a $C^{*}$-algebra, $y, z \in A$, $\phi: A \to A$ be defined by $x \mapsto yxz$, then

  1. (1)

    $\phi$ is completely bounded.

  2. (2)

    If $y = z^{*}$, then $\phi$ is completely positive.

Proof. (1): For each $n \in \natp$ and $T \in M_{n}(A)$,

\[\phi_{n}(T) = (1_{M_n(\complex)}\otimes y)T(1_{M_n(\complex)}\otimes z)\]

$\square$

Proposition 41.3.14.label Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space, then:

  1. (1)

    $C(X; M_{n}(\complex))$ equipped with pointwise product, pointwise involution, and the norm

    \[\norm{f}_{C(X; M_n(\complex))}= \sup_{x \in X}\norm{f(x)}_{M_n(\complex)}\]

    is a $C^{*}$-algebra.

  2. (2)

    The mapping

    \[M_{n}(C(X; \complex)) \to C(X; M_{n}(\complex)) \quad M \otimes f \mapsto M \cdot f\]

    is a *-isomorphism.

  3. (3)

    For any $f \in C(X; M_{n}(\complex))$, $f \ge 0$ if and only if $f(x) \ge 0$ in $M_{n}(\complex)$ for all $x \in X$.

Proof. (1): For any $f \in C(X; M_{n}(\complex))$,

\[\sup_{x \in X}\norm{f(x)}_{M_n(\complex)}^{2} = \sup_{x \in X}\norm{f(x)^*f(x)}_{M_n(\complex)}= \norm{f^*f}_{C(X; M_n(\complex))}\]

(3): If $f \ge 0$, then there exists $g \in C(X; M_{n}(\complex))$ such that $f(x) = g^{*}(x)g(x)$ for all $x \in X$, so $f(x) \ge 0$ in $M_{n}(\complex)$ for all $x \in X$.

On the other hand, if $f(x) \ge 0$ in $M_{n}(\complex)$ for all $x \in X$, then $g(x) = f(x)^{1/2}$ is defined for all $x \in X$. By the continuous functional calculus, $g$ is continuous from $X$ to $M_{n}(\complex)$. Therefore there exists $g \in C(X; M_{n}(\complex))$ such that $f = g^{*}g$.$\square$

Theorem 41.3.15.label Let $A$ be a unital $C^{*}$-algebra, $S \subset A$ be a subspace, $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space, and $\phi \in L(S; C(X; \complex))$, then:

  1. (1)

    $\norm{\phi}_{\text{cb}}= \norm{\phi}_{L(S; C(X; \complex))}$.

  2. (2)

    If $S$ is an operator system and $\phi$ is positive, then $\phi$ is completely positive.

Proof, [Proposition 3.8, Po02]. By Proposition 41.3.14, the norm and order relation on $C(X; M_{n}(\complex)) \iso M_{n}(C(X; \complex))$ are pointwise. As such, assume without loss of generality that $X$ is a single point and $C(X; \complex) = \complex$.

Let $a = (a_{ij}) \in M_{n}(S)$. For each $\xi, \eta \in \complex^{n}$,

\begin{align*}\dpn{\phi_n(a)\xi, \eta}{\complex^n}&= \sum_{i, j = 1}^{n} \xi_{j} \ol{\eta_i}\dpn{a_{ij}, \phi}{S}= \angles{\sum_{i, j = 1}^n a_{ij}\xi_j\ol{\eta_i}, \phi}_{S}\end{align*}

where

\begin{align*}\sum_{i, j = 1}^{n} a_{ij}\xi_{j}\ol{\eta_i}&= (\one \otimes \ol{\eta}) \cdot a \cdot (\xi \otimes \one)\end{align*}

(1):

\begin{align*}|\dpn{\phi_n(a)\xi, \eta}{\complex^n}|&\le \norm{\phi}_{S^*}\cdot \norm{\sum_{i, j = 1}^n a_{ij}\xi_j\ol{\eta_i}}_{S}\\ \norm{\sum_{i, j = 1}^n a_{ij}\xi_j\ol{\eta_i}}_{S}&\le \norm{\xi}_{\complex^n}\norm{\eta}_{\complex^n}\norm{a}_{M_n(S)}\\ \norm{\phi_n(a)}_{M_n(\complex)}&\le \norm{\phi}_{S^*}\norm{a}_{M_n(S)}\\ \norm{\phi}_{\text{cb}}&\le \norm{\phi}_{S^*}\end{align*}

(2): If $\xi = \eta$, then

\[\sum_{i, j = 1}^{n} a_{ij}\eta_{j}\ol{\eta_i}= (\xi \otimes \one)^{*} \cdot a \cdot (\xi \otimes \one) \ge 0\]

so

\[\dpn{\phi_n(a)\xi, \eta}{\complex^n}= \dpn{(\xi \otimes \one)^* \cdot a \cdot (\xi \otimes \one), \phi}{S}\ge 0\]

$\square$

Theorem 41.3.16 (Stinespring).label Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space, $B$ be a $C^{*}$-algebra, $\phi: C(X; \complex) \to B$ be a positive map, then $\phi$ is completely positive.

Proof. Let $P \in C(X; M_{n}(\complex))$ with $P \ge 0$ and $\eps > 0$. By Proposition 6.4.5 and Theorem 5.20.10, there exists a partition of unity $\seqf{\psi_j}\subset C(X; [0, 1])$ and positive matrices $\seqf{p_j}\subset M_{n}(\complex)$ such that

\[\norm{P(x) - \sum_{j = 1}^n p_j\psi_j(x)}_{M_n(\complex)}< \eps\]

for all $x \in X$. For each $1 \le j \le n$, $\phi_{n}(p_{j}\psi_{j}) = p_{j}\phi(\psi_{j}) \ge 0$. As $\eps > 0$ is arbitrary, $\phi_{n}(P) \ge 0$.$\square$

Theorem 41.3.17 (Choi).label Let $n \in \natp$, $B$ be a $C^{*}$-algebra, and $\phi: M_{n}(\complex) \to B$ be a linear map. For each $1 \le i, j \le n$, let $E_{ij}$ be the standard matrix units for $M_{n}(\complex)$, then $C_{\phi} = (\phi(E_{ij})) \in M_{n}(B)$ is the Chi matrix of $\phi$. The mapping $\phi \mapsto C_{\phi}$ is an isomorphism from $L(M_{n}(\complex); B)$ to $M_{n}(B)$, and the following are equivalent:

  1. (1)

    $\phi$ is completely positive.

  2. (2)

    $\phi$ is $n$-positive.

  3. (3)

    $C_{\phi}$ is positive in $M_{n}(B)$.

Proof. (2) $\Rightarrow$ (3): The matrix $E = (E_{ij})$ is positive in $M_{n}(\complex)$.

(3) $\Rightarrow$ (1):

$\phi, \psi \in S(G)$, $K \subset G$ be compact, and $V \in \cn_{G}(1_{G})$ be relatively compact, then

\begin{align*}\end{align*}

$\square$

Post a Comment

Name:Email:
Please enter the tag of the current page (1J9) to post the comment.
Tag: