Proposition 14.7.16.label Let $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, $q: H \to \complex$ be a bounded quadratic function, and
then
- (1)
$\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{q}$ is the unique bounded sesquilinear form on $H$ such that $\dpn{\xi, \xi}{q}= q(\xi)$ for all $\xi \in H$.
- (2)
There exists a unique $T \in B(H)$ such that $q(\xi) = \dpn{T\xi, \xi}{H}$ for all $\xi \in H$.
Proof. (1): Uniqueness is given by polarisation. Existence requires a large number of checkpoints, which are detailed below. Let $M \ge 0$ such that $|q(\xi)| \le M\norm{\xi}_{H}^{2}$ for all $\xi \in H$.
- (1.i)
For each $\xi, \eta, \theta \in H$,
\[\dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}+ \dpn{\theta, \eta}{q}= 2 \angles{\frac{\xi + \theta}{2}, \eta}_{q}\]and
\[\dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}+ \dpn{\xi, \theta}{q}= 2 \angles{\xi, \frac{\eta + \theta}{2}}_{q}\] - (1.ii)
For each dyadic rational number $\lambda \in \mathbb{D}$ with $\lambda \in [0, 1]$,
\[\dpn{\lambda\xi, \eta}{q}= \lambda\dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}= \dpn{\xi, \lambda \eta}{q}\] - (1.iii)
For each $\xi, \eta, \theta \in H$,
\[\dpn{\xi + \theta, \eta}{q}= \dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}+ \dpn{\theta, \eta}{q}\]and
\[\dpn{\xi, \eta + \theta}{q}= \dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}+ \dpn{\xi, \theta}{q}\] - (1.iv)
For each dyadic rational number $\lambda \in \mathbb{D}$,
\[\dpn{\lambda\xi, \eta}{q}= \lambda\dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}= \dpn{\xi, \lambda \eta}{q}\] - (1.v)
For each $\xi, \eta \in H$, $|\dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}| \le M(\norm{\xi}_{H}^{2} +\norm{\eta}_{H}^{2})$.
- (1.vi)
For each $\xi, \eta \in H$, $|\dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}| \le 3M \norm{\xi}_{H}\norm{\eta}_{H}$.
- (1.vii)
$\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{q}$ is a sesquilinear form on $H$.
- (1.viii)
For all $\xi \in H$, $\dpn{\xi, \xi}{q}= q(\xi)$.
(1.i): Let $\xi, \eta, \theta \in H$, then
For each $0 \le k \le 3$, by the Parallelogram Law applied to the pair $((\xi + \theta)/2 + i^{k}\eta, (\xi - \theta)/2)$,
so
Similarly, for each $0 \le k \le 3$, by the Parallelogram Law applied to the pair $(\xi + i^{k}(\eta + \theta)/2, i^{k}(\eta - \theta)/2)$,
and
(1.ii): By definition of $\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{q}$, the claim holds for $0$ and $1$. Let $n \in \natz$ and suppose inductively that the claim holds for all $\lambda \in \mathbb{D}_{n} \cap [0, 1]$. Take $\lambda \in \mathbb{D}_{n+1}\cap [0, 1]$, then there exists $\mu, \nu \in \mathbb{D}_{n} \cap [0, 1]$ such that $\lambda = (\mu + \nu)/2$. In which case, by (1.i),
By induction, $\dpn{\lambda \xi, \eta}{q}= \lambda \dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}$ for all $\lambda \in \mathbb{D}\cap [0, 1]$.
Similarly, $\dpn{\xi, \lambda \eta}{q}= \lambda \dpn{\xi, \eta}{q}$ for all $\lambda \in \mathbb{D}\cap [0, 1]$.
(1.iii): Let $\xi, \eta, \theta \in H$, then by (1.i) and (1.ii),
(1.iv): By (1.ii) and repeated application of (1.iii),
for all $\lambda \in \mathbb{D}$.
(1.v): Let $\xi, \eta \in H$, then
(1.vi): Let $\xi, \eta \in H$ and assume without loss of generality that $\xi, \eta \ne 0$. Since $\norm{\eta}_{H}/\norm{\xi}_{H} > 0$, there exists $n \in \integer$ such that $\norm{\eta}_{H}/\norm{\xi}_{H} \in [2^{n}, 2^{n+1}]$. In which case, by (1.iv),
(1.vii): By (1.iv) and (1.vi), $\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{q}$ is a $\real$-bilinear form on $H$. For any $\xi, \eta \in H$, by absolute homogeneity of $q$,
Therefore $\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{q}$ is a sesquilinear form.
(1.viii): Let $\xi \in H$, then by absolute homogeneity of $q$,
(2): By the Riesz Representation Theorem.$\square$
Post a Comment