33.1 Pontryagin Duality

Definition 33.1.1 (Unitary Character).label Let $G$ be a locally compact Abelian group and $\phi: G \to \mathbb{T}$, then $\phi$ is a unitary character of $G$ if $\phi$ is a continuous homomorphism.

The set $\wh G$ of all unitary characters of $G$, equipped with pointwise operations and the topology of compact convergence, is the dual group of $G$.

For any $\phi \in \wh G$ and $x \in G$, denote $\phi(x) = \dpn{x, \phi}{G}$.

Theorem 33.1.2.label Let $G$ be a locally compact Abelian group and $\phi \in \wh G$. Under the identification that $\mathbb{T}= \partial B_{\complex}(0, 1)$ and $B(\complex) = \complex$, the representation of $L^{1}(G; \complex)$ determined by $\phi$ takes the form

\[\pi_{\phi}: L^{1}(G; \complex) \to \complex \quad \dpn{f, \pi_\phi}{L^1(G; \complex)}= \int_{G} f(x)\dpn{x, \phi}{G}dx\]

and the mapping $\wh G \to \Omega(L^{1}(G; \complex))$ defined by $\phi \mapsto \pi_{\phi}$ is a homeomorphism. Moreover, for any $f \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$ with $\pi_{\phi}(f) \ne 0$, $\dpn{x, \phi}{G}= \pi_{\phi}(L_{x}f)/\pi_{\phi}(f)$ for all $x \in G$.

Proof, [Theorem 4.3, Fol16]. (Continuous): Let $\seqf{f_j}\subset L^{1}(G; \complex)$ and $\eps > 0$. By inner regularity of the Haar measure, there exists $K \subset G$ compact such that $\int_{G\setminus K}|f_{j}| < \eps$ for all $1 \le j \le n$. In which case, for any $\phi, \psi \in \wh G$ with $\sup_{x \in K}|\phi(x) - \psi(x)| < \eps$,

\begin{align}\abs{\dpn{f_j, \phi - \psi}{L^1(G; \complex)}}&\le \int_{K}|f_{j} \cdot (\phi - \psi)| + 2\int_{G \setminus K}|f_{j}| \\&\le \eps \norm{f_j}_{L^1(G; \complex)}+ 2\eps\end{align}

(Injective): By (3) of Definition 32.2.1, $\phi$ is uniquely determined by $\pi_{\phi}$.

(Surjective): Let $\pi \in \Omega(L^{1}(G; \complex))$. Since $G$ is Abelian, $L^{1}(G; \complex)$ is also Abelian by Proposition 31.4.2. As such, for any $x \in G$ and $f, g \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$, $f * (L_{x}g) = L_{x}(f * g) = (L_{x}f) * g$ and $\pi(L_{x}f)\pi(g) = \pi(f)\pi(L_{x}g)$. In particular, if $\pi(f), \pi(g) \ne 0$, then $\pi(L_{x}f)/\pi(f) = \pi(L_{x}g)/\pi(g)$. Let[1]

\[\phi: G \to \complex \quad x \mapsto \frac{\pi(L_{x}f)}{\pi(f)}\]

then $\phi$ is defined independently of the choice of $f$. By continuity of translation, $\phi$ is a continuous homomorphism from $G$ to $\complex \setminus \bracsn{0}$. Moreover, by Proposition 38.7.3, $\norm{\pi}_{L^1(G; \complex)^*}\le 1$, and $\phi$ is bounded. Given that $\phi$ is a homomorphism, $\phi(G) \subset \partial B_{\complex}(0, 1)$, and $\phi \in \wh G$.

Since $\pi \ne 0$, there exists $\psi \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$ with $\pi(\psi) = 1$. Using Riemann sums,

\begin{align*}\pi(f)&= \pi(f)\pi(\psi) = \pi(f * \psi) = \int_{G} f(y)\pi(L_{y}\psi) dy \\&= \int_{G} f(y)\frac{\pi(L_{y}\psi)}{\pi(\psi)}dy = \int_{G} f(y) \dpn{y, \phi}{G}dy\end{align*}

(Embedding): By Proposition 38.7.3, every multiplicative linear functional on $L^{1}(G; \complex)$ is contractive. Hence $\Omega(L^{1}(G; \complex))$ is equicontinuous. By the Arzelà-Ascoli Theorem, the topology of compact convergence on $\Omega(L^{1}(G; \complex))$ coincides with the weak* topology.

Let $\phi, \psi \in \wh G$. Since $\phi \ne 0$, there exists $f \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$ such that $\pi_{\phi}(f) \ne 0$. If $|\pi_{\phi}(f) - \pi_{\psi}(f)|$ is sufficiently small, then $\pi_{\psi}(f) \ne 0$ as well. Let $K \subset G$ be compact, then $\bracsn{L_xf|x \in K}$ is compact in $L^{1}(G; \complex)$ by continuity of translation. In which case,

\[\sup_{x \in K}|(\phi - \psi)(x)| = \sup_{x \in K}\abs{\frac{\pi_{\phi}(L_{x}f)}{\pi_{\phi}(f)} - \frac{\pi_{\psi}(L_{x}f)}{\pi_{\psi}(f)}}\]

Thus for any $\eps > 0$, $\bracsn{\pi_\psi|\psi \in \wh G, \sup_{x \in K}|\phi(x) - \psi(x)| \le \eps}$ is a neighbourhood of $\pi_{\phi}$ in the weak* topology, and the mapping $\psi \mapsto \pi_{\psi}$ is an embedding.$\square$

Proposition 33.1.3.label Let $G$ be a compact Abelian group with $|G| = 1$, then $\wh G$ is an orthonormal set in $L^{2}(G; \complex)$.

Proof, [Proposition 4.4, Fol16]. Let $\phi, \psi \in \wh G$ be distinct, then there exists $x_{0} \in G$ with $\dpn{x_0, \phi}{G}\dpn{x_0, \psi}{G}^{-1}\ne 1$. In which case,

\begin{align*}\int_{G} \phi \ol{\psi}&= \int_{G} \dpn{x, \phi}{G}\dpn{x, \psi}{G}^{-1}dx \\&= \dpn{x_0, \phi}{G}\dpn{x_0, \psi}{G}\int_{G} \dpn{x - x_0, \phi}{G}\dpn{x - x_0, \psi}{G}dx \\&= \dpn{x_0, \phi}{G}\dpn{x_0, \psi}{G}\int \phi \ol{\psi}\end{align*}

so $\phi \perp \psi$.$\square$

Proposition 33.1.4.label Let $G$ be a locally compact Abelian group. If $G$ is discrete, then $\wh G$ is compact. If $G$ is compact, then $\wh G$ is discrete.

Proof, [Proposition 4.5, Fol16]. If $G$ is discrete, then $L^{1}(G; \complex)$ is a unital Banach algebra. By Definition 38.7.4, $\wh G \iso \Omega(L^{1}(G; \complex))$ is compact.

If $G$ is compact, then $\one \in L^{1}(G; \complex)$, and $\bracsn{f \in L^\infty(G; \complex)|\int f| > 1/2}$ is weak*-open. By Proposition 33.1.3, for any $\phi \in \wh G \setminus \bracsn{\one}$, $\int \phi = 0$. Therefore $\bracsn{1}$ is open in $\wh G$, and $\wh G$ is discrete.$\square$

Proposition 33.1.5.label Let $\seqi{G}$ be locally compact Abelian groups where $G_{i}$ is compact for all but finitely many $i \in I$, then

\[\braks{\prod_{i \in I}G_i}^{\wedge} \iso \bigoplus_{i \in I}\wh G_{i}\]

Theorem 33.1.6.label

  1. (1)

    $\wh \real \iso \real$ with dual pairing $\dpn{x, \xi}{\real}= e^{2\pi i \xi x}$.

  2. (2)

    $\wh \mathbb{T}\iso \integer$ with dual pairing $\dpn{x, n}{\mathbb{T}}= x^{n}$.

  3. (3)

    $\wh \integer = \wh \mathbb{T}$ with dual pairing $\dpn{n, x}{\mathbb{T}}= x^{n}$.

Proof, [Proposition 4.6, Fol16]. (1): Let $\phi \in \wh \real$, then $\dpn{0, \phi}{\real}= 1$. Thus there exists $\alpha > 0$ with $A := \int_{0}^{\alpha} \dpn{x, \phi}{\real}dx \ne 0$. In which case,

\[A \dpn{x, \phi}{G}= \int_{0}^{\alpha} \dpn{x + y, \phi}{\real}dy = \int_{x}^{x + \alpha}\dpn{y, \phi}{\real}dy\]

so $\phi \in C^{1}(\real)$ and there exists $c \in \complex$ with $\phi' = c\phi$. Therefore $\dpn{x, \phi}{\real}= e^{cx}$ for all $x \in \real$.$\square$

  1. It may be tempting to construct $\phi$ directly as an element of $L^{\infty}$. However, this requires either reducing to the $\sigma$-compact case, or expanding the measurable sets of the Haar measure.keyboard_return

Post a Comment

Name:Email:
Please enter the tag of the current page (1MC) to post the comment.
Tag: