Proposition 8.11.3. Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$, $\mathfrak{S}\subset 2^{E}$ be an upward-directed system that contains all singletons, and $k \in \natp$, then
The map
\[I: B_{\mathfrak{S}}^{k}(E; B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)) \to B^{k+1}_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)\]defined by
\[(IT)(x_{1}, \cdots, x_{k+1}) = T(x_{1}, \cdots, x_{k})(x_{k+1})\]is an isomorphism.
The map
\[I: \underbrace{B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; \cdots)))}_{k \text{ times}}\to B^{k}_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)\]defined by
\[IT(x_{1}, \cdots, x_{k}) = T(x_{1})\cdots (x_{k})\]is an isomorphism.
which allows the identification
under the map $I$ in (2).
Proof. (1): To see that $I$ is surjective, let $T \in B_{\mathfrak{S}}^{k+1}(E; F)$ and
Let $(x_{1}, \cdots, x_{k}) \in E^{k}$ and $S \in \mathfrak{S}$. Since $\mathfrak{S}$ is upward-directed and contains all singletons, assume without loss of generality that $\bracsn{x_j}_{1}^{k} \subset S$. In which case,
by assumption. Thus $I^{-1}T(x_{1}, \cdots, x_{k}) \in B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)$.
In addition, for any $S_{1} \in \mathfrak{S}$ and entourage $E(S_{2}, U)$ of $B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)$ where $S_{2} \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $U$ is an entourage of $F$, there exists $S \in \mathfrak{S}$ with $S \supset S_{1} \cup S_{2}$. Given that $T(S^{k+1}) \in B(F)$, there exists $\lambda > 0$ such that $T(S^{k+1}) \subset \lambda U(0)$. In which case, $I^{-1}T(S^{k}) \subset \lambda E(S, U)(0)$ and $I^{-1}T(S^{k}) \in B(B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F))$. Thus $I^{-1}T \in B^{k}_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F))$.
It remains to show that $I$ and $I^{-1}$ is continuous. To this end, let $S \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $U$ be an entourage of $F$, then for any $T \in E(S^{k}, E(S, U))(0)$, $IT \in E(S^{k+1}, U)(0)$, so $I$ is continuous.
On the other hand, let $S_{1} \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $E(S_{2}, U)$ be an entourage of $B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)$ where $S_{2} \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $U$ is an entourage of $F$. Let $S \in \mathfrak{S}$ with $S \supset S_{1} \cup S_{2}$, then for any $T \in E(S^{k+1}, U)(0)$, $I^{-1}T \in E(S^{k}, E(S, U))(0)$. Thus $I^{-1}$ is continuous as well.
(2): The case for $k = 2$ is given by (1). If the proposition holds for $k \in \natp$, then
Thus (2) holds for all $k \in \natp$.$\square$