27.6 Runge’s Theorem

Proposition 27.6.1.label Let $K \subset \complex$ be compact and $U \in \cn_{\complex}(K)$, then there exists closed rectifiable curves $\seqf{\gamma_j}$ such that for any separated locally convex space $E$, $f \in H(U; E)$, and $z_{0} \in K$,

\[f(z) = \sum_{j = 1}^{n} \int_{\gamma_j}\frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz\]

Proof, [Proposition VIII.1.1, Con78]. Via fattening, let $V \in \cn_{\complex}^{o}(K)$ precompact with $\ol V \subset U$. Identify $\complex = \real^{2}$, then since $V$ is precompact, there exists $\delta > 0$ and $\seqf{(x_j, y_j)}\subset U$ such that:

  1. (1)

    For each $1 \le j \le n$, $R_{j} = [x_{j}, x_{j} + \delta] \times [y_{j}, y_{j} + \delta] \subset U$.

  2. (2)

    $\bigcup_{j = 1}^{n} R_{j} \supset V$.

  3. (3)

    $x_{j}, y_{j} = 0 \mod \delta$.

In other words, $V$ is covered with a grid of squares with side-length $\delta$ and corners $\seqf{(x_j, y_j)}$. Now, for each $1 \le j \le n$ and $t \in [0, 1]$, let

\begin{align*}\gamma_{j, \rightarrow}(t)&= (1 - t)(x_{j}, y_{j}) + t(x_{j} + \delta, y_{j}) \\ \gamma_{j, \uparrow}(t)&= (1 - t)(x_{j} + \delta, y_{j}) + t(x_{j} + \delta, y_{j} + \delta) \\ \gamma_{j, \leftarrow}(t)&= (1 - t)(x_{j} + \delta, y_{j} + \delta) + t(x_{j}, y_{j} + \delta) \\ \gamma_{j, \downarrow}(t)&= (1 - t)(x_{j}, y_{j} + \delta) + t(x_{j}, y_{j}) \\\end{align*}

and $\gamma_{j} = \gamma_{j, \downarrow}\cdot \gamma_{j, \leftarrow}\cdot \gamma_{j, \uparrow}\cdot \gamma_{j, \rightarrow}$ be their concatenation, then for each $z \in U \setminus \partial R_{j}$,

\[\int_{\gamma_j}\frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz = \begin{cases}f(z)&z \in R_{j}^{o} \\ 0&z \in U \setminus R_{j}\end{cases}\]

by Cauchy’s Integral Formula. Let $\seqf[N]{\mu_j}$ be an enumeration of

\[\bigcup_{j = 1}^{n} \bracs{\gamma_{j, \downarrow}, \gamma_{j, \leftarrow}, \gamma_{j, \uparrow}, \gamma_{j, \rightarrow}}\]

then for each $z_{0} \in \bigcup_{j = 1}^{n} R_{j}^{o}$ and $f \in H(U; E)$,

\[f(z) = \sum_{j = 1}^{N} \int_{\mu_j}\frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz\]

From here, it is sufficient to eliminate line segments that intersect $K$ and ensure that the remaining segments form a collection of loops. Let $1 \le j \le k \le N$, then $(\mu_{j}, \mu_{k})$ is redundant if for each $t \in [0, 1]$, $\mu_{j}(t) = \mu_{k}(1 - t)$. If $(\mu_{j}, \mu_{k})$ are redundant, then

  1. (4)

    There exists no $1 \le l \le N$ with $l \ne j, k$ such that $(\mu_{j}, \mu_{l})$ or $(\mu_{k}, \mu_{l})$ is redundant.

  2. (5)

    $\int_{\mu_j}\frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz + \int_{\mu_k}\frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz = 0$.

so every line segment either cannot form a redundant pair, or forms a unique one.

By relabeling, let $\bracs{\mu_j|1 \le j \le m}$ such that for each $1 \le j \le m$, there exists no $1 \le k \le n$ such that $(\mu_{j}, \mu_{k})$ is redundant. By (5), for each $z_{0} \in \bigcup_{j = 1}^{n} R_{j}^{o}$ and $f \in H(U; E)$,

\[f(z) = \sum_{j = 1}^{m} \int_{\mu_j}\frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz\]

Let $1 \le j \le N$ such that $\mu_{j}([0, 1]) \cap K \ne \emptyset$. Since $V \in \cn_{\complex}(K)$, there exists $1 \le k \le N$ such that $(\mu_{j}, \mu_{k})$ are redundant by (2) and (3). Therefore $\bigcup_{j = 1}^{m} \mu_{j}([0, 1]) \cap K = \emptyset$. Since $\bigcup_{j = 1}^{n} R_{j}^{o}$ is dense in $K$, the above also holds for all $z \in K$.

Finally, let $1 \le j \le m$. Since $\mu_{j}$ does not form a redundant pair, $\mu_{j}(1)$ intersects at most two distinct squares by (3). In which case, there must exist $1 \le k \le m$ such that $\mu_{k}(0) = \mu_{j}(1)$. Therefore $\seqf[m]{\mu_j}$ forms a collection of closed rectifiable curves.$\square$

Lemma 27.6.2.label Let $\gamma \in C([a, b]; \complex)$ be a rectifiable curve, $K \subset \complex$ such that $K \cap \gamma([a, b]) = \emptyset$, $f \in C(\gamma([a, b]); \complex)$, and $\eps > 0$, then there exists $R \in \complex(z)$ such that:

  1. (1)

    $R \in H(\complex \setminus \gamma([a, b]); \complex)$.

  2. (2)

    For each $z_{0} \in K$,

    \[\abs{\int_{\gamma} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz - R(z)}< \eps\]

Proof, [Lemma VIII.1.5, Con78]. Since the mapping

\[\varphi: K \times [a, b] \to \complex \quad (z_{0}, t) \mapsto \frac{f \circ \gamma(t)}{\gamma(t) - z}\]

is continuous, it is uniformly continuous by Proposition 6.4.5. Hence the mappings $\bracs{\varphi(z_0, \cdot)|t \in [a, b]}$ are uniformly equicontinuous. Thus there exists $\delta > 0$ such that for each $s, t \in [a, b]$ with $|s - t| \le \delta$,

\[\abs{\frac{f \circ \gamma(s)}{\gamma(s) - z_{0}} - \frac{f \circ \gamma(t)}{\gamma(t) - z_{0}}}< \eps\]

for all $z_{0} \in K$.

Let $(P = \seqfz{t_j}) \in \scp([a, b])$ with $\sigma(t) < \delta$, and

\[R(z) = \sum_{j = 1}^{n} f \circ \gamma(t_{j})\frac{\gamma(t_{j}) - \gamma(t_{j-1})}{\gamma(t_{j}) - z}\]

then $R \in \complex(z) \cap H(\complex \setminus \gamma([a, b]); \complex)$, and for each $z_{0} \in K$,

\begin{align*}\abs{\int_\gamma \frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz - R(z)}&\le \sum_{j = 1}^{n} \int_{t_{j-1}}^{t_j}\abs{\frac{f \circ \gamma(t)}{\gamma(t) - z_{0}} - \frac{f \circ \gamma(t_{j})}{\gamma(t_{j}) - z}}\gamma(dt) \\&\le \eps \norm{\gamma}_{\text{var}}\end{align*}

$\square$

Lemma 27.6.3 (Pole Pushing).label Let $K \subset \complex$ be compact and $P \subset \complex_{\infty} \setminus K$ such that $P$ intersects every connected component of $\complex_{\infty} \setminus K$, then for every $a \in \complex \setminus K$ and $\eps > 0$, there exists $R \in \complex(z)$ such that:

  1. (1)

    $R \in H(\complex_{\infty} \setminus P; \complex)$.

  2. (2)

    For every $z \in K$, $|R(z) - 1/(z - a)| < \eps$.

Proof, [Lemma III.1.10, Con78]. First suppose that $\infty \not\in P$. Let $A \subset \complex_{\infty} \setminus K$ be the collection of elements such that the lemma holds[1].

Let $a_{0} \in \complex \setminus K$, then there exists $V \in \cn_{\complex}(a)$ compact such that $V \cap K = \emptyset$. In which case, the function

\[K \times V \to \complex \quad (z, a) \mapsto \frac{1}{z - a}\]

is continuous, and hence uniformly continuous by Proposition 6.4.5. Thus $1/(z - a) \to 1/(z - a_{0})$ uniformly on compact sets as $a \to a_{0}$, and if $a_{0} \in \ol{A}$, then $a_{0} \in A$ as well. Therefore $A$ is a closed subset of $\complex_{\infty} \setminus K$.

Now, let $a_{0} \in A \cap \complex$, then by Proposition 8.2.5, $r = d(a_{0}, K) > 0$. Let $a \in B_{\complex}(a_{0}, r)$, then for each $z \in K$,

\begin{align*}\frac{1}{z - a}&= \frac{1}{z - a_{0}}\frac{z - a_{0}}{z - a}= \frac{1}{z - a_{0}}\braks{\frac{z - a}{z - a_{0}}}^{-1}\\&= \frac{1}{z - a_{0}}\braks{1 - \frac{a - a_{0}}{z - a_{0}}}^{-1}\end{align*}

Since $\sup_{z \in K}|a - a_{0}|/|z - a_{0}| < 1$,

\[\frac{1}{z - a}= \frac{1}{z - a_{0}}\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \braks{\frac{a - a_{0}}{z - a_{0}}}^{n}\]

where the convergence is uniform on $K$. Therefore $B_{\complex}(a_{0}, r) \subset A$ as well.

Finally, for each $a \in \complex \setminus K$ with $|a| > \sup_{z \in K}|z|$,

\[\frac{1}{z - a}= -\frac{1}{a\paren{1 - \frac{z}{a}}}= -\frac{1}{a}\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \braks{\frac{z}{a}}^{n}\]

where the convergence is uniform on $K$, so there exists a neighbourhood of $\infty$ that is contained in $A$.

Since $P \cup \bracs{\infty}\subset A$, and $A$ is an open and closed subset of $C_{\infty} \setminus K$, $A$ is a union of connected components of $\complex_{\infty} \setminus K$ by Lemma 5.12.5. Given that $P$ intersects every connected component of $\complex_{\infty} \setminus K$, the lemma holds for all $a \in \complex \setminus K$.$\square$

Theorem 27.6.4 (Runge).label Let $K \subset \complex$ be compact and $P \subset \complex_{\infty} \setminus K$ such that $P$ intersects every connected component of $\complex_{\infty} \setminus K$, then $\complex(x) \cap H(\complex_{\infty} \setminus P; \complex)$ is dense in $H(K; \complex)$ with respect to the uniform topology.

Proof. Let $U \in \cn_{\complex}(K)$, $f \in H(U; \complex)$, and $\eps > 0$. By Proposition 27.6.1, there exists closed rectifiable curves $\seqf{\gamma_j}$ in $U \setminus V$ such that for each $z_{0} \in K$,

\[f(z_{0}) = \sum_{j = 1}^{n} \int_{\gamma_j}\frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz\]

Let $T$ be the union of the images of $\seqf{\gamma_j}$, then by Lemma 27.6.2, there exists $\seqf{R_j}\subset \complex(z) \cap H(\complex \setminus T; \complex)$ such that for each $z_{0} \in K$ and $1 \le j \le n$,

\[\abs{\int_{\gamma_j}\frac{f(z)}{z - z_{0}}dz - R_j(z)}< \frac{\eps}{n}\]

so

\[\abs{f(z_0) - \sum_{j = 1}^n R_j(z)}< \eps\]

for all $z_{0} \in K$. By the pole pushing lemma, there exists $S \in \complex(z) \cap H(\complex_{\infty} \setminus P)$ such that $|S(z_{0}) - \sum_{j = 1}^{n} R_{j}(z_{0})| < \eps$ for all $z_{0} \in K$.$\square$

Corollary 27.6.5.label Let $K \subset \complex$ be compact, then $\complex(z) \cap H(K; \complex)$ is dense in $H(K; \complex)$.

  1. Under the identification that $1/(z - \infty) = 0$.keyboard_return

Post a Comment

Name:Email:
Please enter the tag of the current page (UZ) to post the comment.
Tag: