31.2 Zeroes of Holomorphic Functions

Definition 31.2.1 (Zero).label Let $E$ be a complete separated locally convex space over $\complex$, $U \subset \complex$ be open, $f \in H(U; E)$, and $z_{0} \in U$, then $z_{0}$ is a zero of $f$ of multiplicity $n \in \natp$ if there exists $g \in H(U; E)$ such that $f(z) = (z - a)^{n} g(z)$ for all $z \in \bracs{g \ne 0}$.

Proposition 31.2.2.label Let $E$ be a complete separated locally convex space over $\complex$, $U \subset \complex$ be open and connected, and $f \in H(U; E)$, then the following are equivalent:

  1. (1)

    $f = 0$.

  2. (2)

    There exists $z_{0} \in U$ such that $D^{n}f(z_{0}) = 0$ for all $n \in \natp$.

  3. (3)

    There exists $z_{0} \in U$ such that $z_{0} \in \ol{\bracs{f = 0} \setminus \bracs{z_0}}$.

Proof. (3) $\Rightarrow$ (2): Let $r > 0$ and $\bracs{a_n}_{0}^{\infty} \subset E$ such that $f(z) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} a_{n} (z - z_{0})^{n}$ for all $z \in B(z_{0}, r)$, where the series has a radius of convergence of at least $r$. By continuity of $f$, $a_{0} = f(0) = 0$.

Suppose inductively that $a_{k} = 0$ for each $0 \le k \le n$. Let $[\cdot]_{E}: E \to [0, \infty)$ be a continuous seminorm, then for each $z \in B(z_{0}, r) \cap \bracs{f = 0}\setminus \bracs{z_0}$,

\begin{align*}f(z)&= \sum_{k = n + 1}^{\infty} a_{k}(z - z_{0})^{k} \\ [a_{n+1}(z - z_{0})^{n+1}]_{E}&\le \sum_{k = n+2}^{\infty} [a_{k}(z - z_{0})^{k}]_{E} = \sum_{k = n+2}^{\infty} |z - z_{0}|^{k}[a_{k}]_{E} \\ [a_{n+1}]_{E}&\le |z - z_{0}| \sum_{k = 0}^{\infty} |z - z_{0}|^{k}[a_{k+n+2}]_{E}\end{align*}

Since the series $\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} a_{n} (z - z_{0})^{n}$ has a radius of convergence of at least $r$, $\limsup_{n \to \infty}[a_{n}]_{E}^{1/n}\le 1/r$, so there exists $N \ge n+2$ such that $[a_{k}]_{E}^{1/k}\le 2/r$ for all $k \ge N$. For each $s \in (0, r/4)$, $B(z_{0}, s) \cap \bracs{f = 0}\setminus \bracs{z_0}\ne \emptyset$, thus

\[[a_{n+1}]_{E} \le s \braks{\sum_{k = 0}^N \paren{\frac{r}{4}}^k[a_{k+n+2}]_E + \sum_{k > N}\frac{1}{2^{k}}}\]

As the above holds for all $s \in (0, r/4)$, $[a_{n+1}]_{E} = 0$. Therefore $a_{n} = 0$ for all $n \in \natp$.

(2) $\Rightarrow$ (1): By continuity, $\bracs{f = 0}$ is closed. By local power series expansion and (3), $\bracs{f = 0}$ is open. As $U$ is connected, $U = \bracs{f = 0}$.$\square$

Proposition 31.2.3.label Let $E$ be a complete separated locally convex space over $\complex$, $U \subset \complex$ be connected, and $f \in H(U; E) \setminus \bracs{0}$, then for each $z_{0} \in \bracs{f = 0}$, there exists $n \ge 1$ and $g \in H(U; \complex)$ such that:

  1. (1)

    $g(a) \ne 0$.

  2. (2)

    For each $z \in U$, $f(z) = (z - z_{0})^{n}g(z)$.

Proof. Since $f \ne 0$, $n = \min\bracs{n \in \natp| D^nf(z_0) \ne 0}< \infty$ by Proposition 31.2.2. Let

\[g: U \to E \quad z \mapsto \begin{cases}\frac{f(z)}{(z - z_0)^n}&z \ne z_{0} \\ \frac{1}{n!}D^{n}f(z_{0})&z = z_{0}\end{cases}\]

then $g$ is continuous on $U$ and holomorphic on $U \setminus \bracs{z_0}$. As $f \in H(U; E)$, there exists $r > 0$ and $\bracs{a_k}_{0}^{\infty} \subset E$ such that $f(z) = \sum_{k = 0}^{\infty} a_{k} (z - z_{0})^{k}$ for all $z \in B(z_{0}, r)$, where the series has a radius of convergence of at least $r$. By assumption on $n$, for each $z \in B(z_{0}, r)$,

\begin{align*}f(z)&= \sum_{k = 0}^{\infty} a_{k} (z - z_{0})^{k} = \sum_{k = n}^{\infty} a_{k}(z - z_{0})^{k} \\ g(z)&= \sum_{k = 0}^{\infty} a_{k+n}(z - z_{0})^{k}\end{align*}

where the series $\sum_{k = 0}^{\infty} a_{k+n}(z - z_{0})^{k}$ has the same radius of convergence. Therefore $g$ is holomorphic at $z_{0}$.$\square$

Theorem 31.2.4 (Maximum Modulus Theorem).label Let $E$ be a complete separated locally convex space over $\complex$, $U \subset \complex$ be open and connected, then

  1. (1)

    For each $f \in H(U; E)$ and continuous seminorm $[\cdot]_{E}: E \to [0, \infty)$, if there exists $z_{0} \in U$ with

    \[[f(z_{0})]_{E} = \sup_{z \in U}[f(z)]_{E}\]

    then $[f]_{E}$ is constant.

  2. (2)

    For any $f \in H(U; \complex)$, if there exists $z_{0} \in U$ with

    \[|f(z_{0})| = \sup_{z \in U}|f(z)|\]

    then $f$ is constant.

Proof. (1): Let $M = \sup_{z \in U}[f(z)]_{E}$. Since $[f]_{E}$ is continuous, $\bracsn{[f]_E = M}$ is closed. By Cauchy’s Integral Formula and Proposition 14.4.1, $\bracsn{[f]_E = M}$ is open. As $U$ is connected, $\bracsn{[f]_E = M}= U$.

(2): By (1), $|f|$ is constant. After rescaling, assume without loss of generality that $\ol f = 1/f$. In this case, for each $z \in U$,

\[D\ol f(z) = \lim_{\substack{h \to 0 \\ h \in \real}}\frac{\ol{f(x + h) - f(x)}}{h}= \ol{Df}(z)\]

and

\[D\ol f(z) = \lim_{\substack{h \to 0 \\ h \in \real}}\frac{\ol{f(x + ih) - f(x)}}{ih}= -\ol{Df}(z)\]

so $Df = 0$ and $f$ is constant.$\square$

Lemma 31.2.5.label Let $S = \bracs{z \in \complex| \text{Re}(z) \in (0, 1)}$, $E$ be a Banach space over $\complex$, and $f \in H(S; E) \cap BC(\ol S; E)$, then

\[\norm{f}_{u}= \sup_{z \in \partial S}\norm{f(z)}_{E}\]

Proof. Let $\eps > 0$ and $\phi_{\eps}(z) = e^{\eps(z^2 - 1)}$, then $\phi f \in H(S; E) \cap BC(\ol S; E)$.

For each $R > 0$, let $S_{R} = \bracs{z \in \complex| \text{Re}(z) \in (0, 1), |\text{Im}(z)| < R}$, then by the Maximum Modulus Theorem,

\[\norm{\phi_\eps f}_{u} = \lim_{R \to \infty}\sup_{z \in \partial S_R}\norm{\phi_\eps f(z)}_{E}\]

However, since $\phi_{\eps} f(z) \to 0$ as $|\text{Im}(z)| \to \infty$,

\[\norm{\phi_\eps f}_{u} = \lim_{R \to \infty}\sup_{z \in \partial S_R}\norm{\phi_\eps f(z)}_{E} = \sup_{z \in \partial S}\norm{\phi_\eps f(z)}_{E}\]

Therefore

\[\norm{f}_{u} = \sup_{\eps > 0}\norm{\phi_\eps f}_{u} = \sup_{\eps > 0}\sup_{z \in \partial S}\norm{\phi_\eps f(z)}_{E} = \sup_{z \in \partial S}\norm{f(z)}_{E}\]

$\square$

Lemma 31.2.6 (Hadamard’s Three Lines Lemma).label Let $S = \bracs{z \in \complex| \text{Re}(z) \in [0, 1]}$, $E$ be a Banach space over $\complex$, and $f \in H(S; E) \cap BC(\ol{S}; E)$. For each $s \in [0, 1]$, let

\[M(\theta) = \sup_{t \in \real}\norm{f(s + it)}_{E}\]

then for each $s \in [0, 1]$, $M(s) \le M(0)^{s} M(1)^{1-s}$.

Proof, [Theorem VI.3.7, Con78]. Assume without loss of generality that $M(0), M(1) > 0$. Let

\[g: \complex \to \complex \quad z \mapsto M(0)^{z} M(1)^{1 - z}\]

then $g$ is a non-vanishing entire function, and for each $z \in \complex$,

\[|g(z)| = M(0)^{\text{Re}(z)}M(1)^{\text{Re}(1 - z)}\]

so $|g|^{-1}$ is bounded on $\ol S$ by Proposition 5.16.3. Let

\[h: \ol S \to E \quad z \mapsto \frac{f(z)}{g(z)}\]

then $h \in H(S; E) \cap BC(\ol S; E)$ with $\norm{h(z)}_{E} \le 1$ for all $z \in \partial S$. By the Maximum Modulus Theorem, $\norm{h(z)}_{E} \le 1$ for all $z \in S$. Thus for every $z \in S$,

\[f(z) \le M(0)^{\text{Re}(z)}M(1)^{1-\text{Re}(z)}\]

Therefore $M(s) \le M(0)^{s} M(1)^{1-s}$ for every $s \in [0, 1]$.$\square$

Post a Comment

Name:Email:
Please enter the tag of the current page (VY) to post the comment.
Tag: